The people behind the stories
Good stories start with good sources.
Useful context, clear credit and room to change our minds when the evidence changes.
Follow the story to its source
Announcements should point to the developer’s original statement. Creator coverage should link to the video, post or stream that supports the account. A short clip can leave out important context; we look for the surrounding discussion before drawing conclusions.
Every original piece needs a clear game edition, sources for its factual claims and something useful beyond a rewritten headline. An old event remains an old event even when its clip is uploaded again.
Disagreement is a story. Outrage is not a quota.
We can cover an unpopular change, a disputed design decision or a creator’s criticism without pretending everyone agrees. We identify who said what, explain what is known and make our interpretation clear. Rumour, speculation and personal experience must not be presented as established facts.
We do not invent quotes, player experiences or controversy. Criticism should address an argument or action without encouraging harassment.
Credit the people who made it
Creator work keeps its attribution and original link. We use permitted imagery, original explanatory visuals and supported embeds. Credit is not a substitute for permission to copy an image or rehost a video.
Creators can request a correction or removal without a WoW Scroll account. Include the WoW Scroll URL, the original work and enough information to establish your connection to it.
A person remains responsible
Kyle is responsible for publication decisions. Automated collection helps find candidates; it does not approve them. AI may assist with research organization, outlines and editing. Sources still need to be inspected, and the final piece needs human review. Generated summaries are not firsthand reporting.
Any sponsorship, paid placement or affiliate relationship should be disclosed next to the relevant content.
Correct the record
Send a correction with the article URL and the evidence we should consider. When a material factual error is corrected, the article should carry a visible correction note explaining the change. Small spelling or formatting fixes do not make an old article newly reported news.